Wednesday, November 24, 2010

The Pilgrims' Real Thanksgiving Lesson

The First Thanksgiving

Posted from The Beacon.

Feast and football. That’s what many of us think about at Thanksgiving. Most people identify the origin of the holiday with the Pilgrims’ first bountiful harvest. But few understand how the Pilgrims actually solved their chronic food shortages.

Many people believe that after suffering through a severe winter, the Pilgrims’ food shortages were resolved the following spring when the Native Americans taught them to plant corn and a Thanksgiving celebration resulted. In fact, the pilgrims continued to face chronic food shortages for three years until the harvest of 1623. Bad weather or lack of farming knowledge did not cause the pilgrims’ shortages. Bad economic incentives did.

In 1620 Plymouth Plantation was founded with a system of communal property rights. Food and supplies were held in common and then distributed based on “equality” and “need” as determined by Plantation officials. People received the same rations whether or not they contributed to producing the food, and residents were forbidden from producing their own food. Governor William Bradford, in his 1647 history, Of Plymouth Plantation, wrote that this system “was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.” The problem was that “young men, that were most able and fit for labour, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men’s wives and children without any recompense.” Because of the poor incentives, little food was produced.

Faced with potential starvation in the spring of 1623, the colony decided to implement a new economic system. Every family was assigned a private parcel of land. They could then keep all they grew for themselves, but now they alone were responsible for feeding themselves. While not a complete private property system, the move away from communal ownership had dramatic results.

This change, Bradford wrote, “had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.” Giving people economic incentives changed their behavior. Once the new system of property rights was in place, “the women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability.”

Once the Pilgrims in the Plymouth Plantation abandoned their communal economic system and adopted one with greater individual property rights, they never again faced the starvation and food shortages of the first three years. It was only after allowing greater property rights that they could feast without worrying that famine was just around the corner.

We are direct beneficiaries of the economics lesson the pilgrims learned in 1623. Today we have a much better developed and well-defined set of property rights. Our economic system offers incentives for us—in the form of prices and profits—to coordinate our individual behavior for the mutual benefit of all; even those we may not personally know.

It is customary in many families to “give thanks to the hands that prepared this feast” during the Thanksgiving dinner blessing. Perhaps we should also be thankful for the millions of other hands that helped get the dinner to the table: the grocer who sold us the turkey, the truck driver who delivered it to the store, and the farmer who raised it all contributed to our Thanksgiving dinner because our economic system rewards them. That’s the real lesson of Thanksgiving. The economic incentives provided by private competitive markets where people are left free to make their own choices make bountiful feasts possible.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Guide Me, O Thou Great Jehovah

I'm playing this lovely hymn for church this Sunday, and as I was practicing this afternoon, I realized that I'd forgotten how much I love the words. May this encourage you today!


"Guide Me, O Thou Great Jehovah"

by William Williams, 1745


Guide me, O thou great Jehovah, pilgrim through this barren land;

I am weak, but thou art mighty; hold me with thy pow'rful hand;

Bread of heaven, Bread of heaven,

feed me till I want no more, feed me till I want no more.


Open now the crystal fountain, whence the healing stream doth flow;

let the fire and cloudy pillar lead me all my journey through;

strong Deliv'rer, strong Deliv'rer,

be thou still my strength and shield, be thou still my strength and shield.


When I tread the verge of Jordan, bid my anxious fears subside;

death of death, and hell's destruction, land me safe on Canaan's side;

songs of praises, songs of praises

I will ever give to thee, I will ever give to thee.

Saturday, July 31, 2010

Tahoe 2010

After two glorious weeks in paradise (otherwise known as Lake Tahoe), I do have to admit that it's wonderful to come home to...

... my own bed and pillows and blankets.

... a bathroom that seems HUGE and full of elbow-room and counter-space (never take those things for granted!).

... a house with clean floors that don't make my feet filthy every night by bedtime.

... consistent cell reception.

... my piano.

... a very happy, filthy, stinky doggie.

But as I reflect on those fabulous two weeks, I miss...

... such wonderful time with family.

... after-dinner conversations and laughter with the whole family together.

... the breathtaking view and the lake literally out our back door (a mere three flights of stairs off the back deck).

... sand between my toes and the crystal-clear lake water.

... relaxing afternoons spent reading on the beach (I finished The Giver and am about 3/4 through The Count of Monte Cristo -- the unabridged version!).

... game evenings around the living room game table.

... cooking with the stereo blasting (we divided the cooking between couples this year, with each couple preparing two dinners, and it worked out great!).

... gorgeous sunrises and sunsets over the lake.

It's good to be home. But oh, how hard it was to leave.

More thoughts and pictures coming soon. Promise. =)

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

Cleaning and packing and excitement, oh my!

It's amazing how when one phase of life ends, another begins with just as much vigor and hectic-ness. My just-completed college phase has given way to a new phase full of work and projects, and right now, preparations for vacation. It's after 9:00pm and I'm still cleaning like a maniac, so this post really only consists of random thoughts for the day...

- I have an even dozen books stacked up on my desk to take with me on vacation. Yes, perhaps I'm a bit over-ambitious. We'll see how many of those actually get read, but hey, it's worth a try!

- Soundtracks are awesome accompaniment to excitement. Meg & I rediscovered Open Range today, and I have to admit that I had forgotten how epic it is.

- I once heard that it has been scientifically proven that people who have trips and vacations to look forward to are happier people. I believe it. There is so much excitement around our house right now.

- Lunches with Katie are wonderful.

And that is all I have time for today. =)

Happy July, everyone!

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Sadly neglected

Yes, my blog has been quite sadly neglected of late.

Life has been a whirlwind.

But things are settling down! (Or at least moving to a new/different level of busy-ness.) Perhaps the most important reason is my recent completion of my very last college course. That's right, I'm DONE. I should be receiving my diploma within the next few weeks, and I could not be more thrilled. Life has now switched to a completely different gear, and I love the change of pace.

In my newfound extra time, as I attempt to be productive and efficient, I have been inspired by the idea of a plethora of do-it-yourself projects. Due to brilliant blogs like Young House Love and Life in Grace, I feel like my head has become a veritable DIY factory, just ready to explode with ideas. Any favorite DIY-type blogs that y'all like to follow?

My job is expanding in exciting and exhilarating ways, and I am thrilled to be a part of it all. My newest project: grant-writing. My knowledge is mere bare-bones, but I plan to spend the next several weeks educating myself, and then dive into the overwhelming world of grant requests and funding proposals. I'm excited!

In the short-term future, we now have less than a week before these two arrive!

And just several days after that, we all pack it up for two weeks of vacation bliss.

"LET IT BEGIN, LET IT BEGIN!!!!!"

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

The best and worst of CCM

I have had a real love-hate relationship with contemporary Christian music for about the last eight to ten years. There was a time when I listened to CCM constantly—I knew almost every song on the radio, and my dad and I would even have contests whenever we would get in the car to see who could guess the song and artist first in the shortest amount of time. Then sometime after the car-contest-era, I swore off CCM completely. As my family and I came to a deeper, thoroughly Reformed theological understanding, I became increasingly frustrated with the simplistic, shallow nature of the vast majority of contemporary Christian music. Every time I turned on the radio, I would get so discouraged that I would almost immediately turn it off again. There was no depth—no reverence—no sense of awe at a majestic, awesome, holy God. I quit listening.

I developed a keen interest in film scores—you know, the instrumental backing to a movie that provides much of the emotional framework for the story’s impact. I became a soundtrack geek, rediscovering a sampling of classical music at the same time. My taste in music became gradually more and more eclectic in nature; I delved into Celtic music, and I even developed an enthusiasm for orchestrated metal. The depth and complexity of the music (and, oftentimes, the lyrics as well) was, and is, fascinating. But still no CCM. None at all.

It’s been several years since then, and I have now reached the point where I can again listen to CCM in moderate doses. I have discovered that there are actually some songs and artists that are worth listening to. Yes, there is much that deserves to be thrown out the window. But there is also some that adequately expresses the glory of the cross, the incredible gift of redemption, and the unmerited favor that is our salvation in Christ. You have to dig harder to find it. But it is out there.

Today as I was driving home from work, with my radio tuned to one of the valley’s Christian radio stations, I heard a song that personifies everything I learned to hate about contemporary Christian music. I do have to admit that this is one song that I really can’t stand to let play. Any time it comes on while I happen to be listening, I just have to turn it off. It’s nothing personal against the song or the artist, but it demonstrates oh-so-clearly not only the lack of depth but also the complete lack of theological understanding that permeates much of the Christian music scene. The song is by Francesca Battistelli, and part of the lyrics go like this: “‘Cause I got a couple dents in my fender / got a couple rips in my jeans / try to fit the pieces together / but perfection is my enemy / on my own I’m so clumsy / but on Your shoulders I can see / I’m free to be me.”

Now, I don’t know about you, but I know for a fact that I have a whole lot more that is wrong with my heart than “a couple dents in my fender” or “a couple rips in my jeans”. Perfection is not just my enemy—it’s absolutely unattainable in this life. I’m more than just clumsy; I’m absolutely lost and helpless apart from One who is greater than I. Salvation isn’t just about finding that I am “free to be me”. It’s about falling down at the foot of the cross, acknowledging my sinful soul and my absolute dependence upon my Savior, and looking to Him alone to bring me to heaven. It’s about the glorious and inexplicable truth that although I can do absolutely nothing to bring my sinful heart into submission to Him, yet He looks upon me not in myself, but in Christ, and Christ’s merit covers my sin completely. I am free and forgiven, in Him. Now that is something worth singing about! Unfortunately, however, the true glory of the Gospel rarely comes across in its fullness in much of Christian pop music.

There are some exceptions, though. Michael Card, for example, has always been one of my favorite artists. Not only is his music unique and beautiful, but his lyrics also reflect the highs and lows of the Christian life, and the full range of Christian experience. I recently have been listening to his “Ancient Faith” album, a 2-disc masterpiece that starts at creation and explores many of the themes of the Old Testament. It is truly magnificent. Comparing the songs from “Ancient Faith” to the song I was quoting earlier… well, the contrast is stark. Card’s music carries with it a sense of reverence and awe in the face of a holy God. His lyrics reflect what it truly means to be a Christian—from the depths of despair to the heights of rejoicing. He digs deep into the Scriptures and mines gems that are expressed with perhaps greater power and poignancy through music. Music is meant to display the full range of human emotion, and especially for the Christian artist, the full range of spiritual emotion. Card does so. Artists like Michael Card have gradually brought me back around to listening to CCM again.

I still am a soundtrack geek. I still like a good dose of orchestrated metal. I wouldn’t say that I am, generally speaking, a fan of contemporary Christian music. But I am glad to have reached the point again where I can turn on Christian radio without cringing.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Monday randoms...

~ I only have 11 weeks of school left. There really IS light at the end of the tunnel!

~ I finally broke down and took claritin today. A morning of non-stop sneezing gets rather exhausting.

~ I am officially in love with the song "Before the Throne of God Above" by Selah. I can't stop listening to it!

~ This spring weather makes me happy. If only 100-degree days could just disappear instead of being just a short few weeks away!

~ I can't seem to keep up my blog lately. Am I losing all my creativity on homework so that I have nothing left to say? Hmm, so it would seem.

~ My stack of books just keeps building, and I am oh-so-greatly anticipating having the opportunity to actually READ them all.

~ Michael Buble is my new favorite happy music.

~ I have been blessed beyond degree.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Thoughts on Law

This week I chose to write my discussion for International Business class on the concept of common law. It turned out to be a far broader assignment than I initially anticipated, but it was quite a fascinating process to do the research. One article in particular, which I ended up not even referencing in the discussion, was particularly though-provoking for me--so much so that I had to restrain myself from referencing it, lest I end up quoting the entire thing! It is well-written, apropos, and will certainly make you think.

The original version is, of course, prettier than my blog version, and can be viewed here: http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/legislation-and-law-in-a-free-society/.

~*~

Legislation and Law in a Free Society
Posted By N. Stephan Kinsella • September 1995 • Vol. 45/Issue 9

Mr. Kinsella practices law with Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis in Philadelphia. This article is adapted from a longer essay forthcoming in the Journal of Libertarian Studies, which contains detailed references to the authors and works cited here.

Libertarians and classical liberals have long sought to explain what sorts of laws we should have in a free society. But we have often neglected the study of what sort of legal system is appropriate for developing a proper body of law.

Historically, in the common law of England, Roman law, and the Law Merchant, law was formed in large part in thousands of judicial decisions. In these so-called “decentralized law-finding systems,” the law evolved as judges, arbitrators, or other jurists discovered legal principles applicable to specific factual situations, building upon legal principles previously discovered, and statutes, or centralized law, played a relatively minor role. Today, however, statutes passed by the legislature are becoming the primary source of law, and law tends to be thought of as being identical to legislation. Yet legislation-based systems cannot be expected to develop law compatible with a free society.

Certainty, which includes clarity of and stability in the law, is necessary so that we are able to plan for the future. Often it is thought that certainty will be increased when the law is written and enunciated by a legislature, for example in the civil codes of modern civil-law systems.

As the late Italian legal theorist Bruno Leoni pointed out, however, there is much more certainty in a decentralized legal system than in a centralized, legislation-based system. When the legislature has the ability to change the law from day to day, we can never be sure what rules will apply tomorrow. By contrast, judicial decisions are much less able to reduce legal certainty than is legislation.

This is because the position of common-law or decentralized judges is fundamentally different from that of legislators in three respects. First, judges can only make decisions when asked to do so by the parties concerned. Second, the judge’s decision is less far-reaching than legislation because it primarily affects the parties to the dispute, and only occasionally affects third parties or others with no connection to the parties involved. Third, a judge’s discretion is limited by the necessity of referring to similar precedents. Legal certainty is thus more attainable in a relatively decentralized law-finding system like the common law, Roman law, or customary law, than in centralized law-making systems where legislation is the primary source of law.

Negative Effects of Uncertainty

Legislation tends to interfere with agreements that courts would otherwise have enforced and thereby makes parties to contracts less certain that the contract will ultimately be enforced. Thus, individuals tend to rely less on contracts, leading them to develop costly alternatives such as structuring companies, transactions, or production processes differently than they otherwise would have.

Another pernicious effect of the increased uncertainty in legislation-based systems is the increase of overall time preference. Individuals invariably demonstrate a preference for earlier goods over later goods, all things being equal. When time preferences are lower, individuals are more willing to forgo immediate benefits such as consumption, and invest their time and capital in more indirect (i.e., more roundabout, lengthier) production processes, which yield more and/or better goods for consumption or for further production. Any artificial raising of the general time preference rate thus tends to impoverish society by pushing us away from production and long-term investments. Yet increased uncertainty, which is brought about by a legislation-based system, causes an increase in time preference rates because if the future is less certain, it is relatively less valuable compared to the present.

In addition to materially impoverishing society, higher time preference rates also lead to increased crime. As a person becomes more present-oriented, immediate (criminal) gratifications become relatively more attractive, and future, uncertain punishment becomes less of a deterrent.

Central Planning and Economic Calculation

Ludwig von Mises showed that, without a decentralized private property system, the free market prices which are essential in economic calculation cannot be generated. As Leoni has explained, Mises’ criticism of socialism also applies to a legislature attempting to “centrally plan” the laws of a society. The impossibility of socialism is only a special case of the general inability of central planners to collect and assimilate information widely dispersed in society. The widely dispersed, decentralized character of knowledge and information in society simply makes it too difficult for centralized legislators to rationally plan the laws of society.

Legislators’ inescapable ignorance also makes them less able to truly represent the general will of the populace and likely to be influenced by special interests. Because of their ignorance, they have no reliable guide for knowing what statutes to enact, which makes them more likely to be influenced by lobbyists and special interest groups. This leads to statutes that benefit a select few at the expense of others and, in the long run, at the expense of all of society.

Decentralized law-finding systems like the common law, on the other hand, are analogous to free markets in that a natural order, unplanned by government decrees, arises in both. Additionally, as pointed out by Richard Epstein, because alteration of legislation and regulation is likely to have more of a payoff for lobbyists than convincing a judge to change common-law type rules, judges are also less likely to be the target of special interests than are legislators.

The Proliferation of Laws

Because of the systematic ignorance that legislators face, legislation often disrupts the delicate economic, legal, and social order of society, leading to unintended consequences. And invariably, because of government propaganda combined with public ignorance and apathy, the inevitable failures of legislation are blamed, not on interventionist government, but on freedom and unregulated human conduct, leading to even more meddlesome legislation.

Such a continual outpouring of artificial laws has many insidious effects. As special interest groups become successful, others become necessary for self-defense, and soon a legal war of all against all begins to emerge. Thus we are led into conflict rather than cooperation. Additionally, when so many laws exist, and with such arcane, vague, complex language as is common today, it becomes impossible for each citizen to avoid being a law-breaker—especially given the perverse rule that “ignorance of the law is no excuse.” Almost everyone has violated a tax law, securities regulation, “racketeering” law, gun law, alcohol law, customs regulation, or at least traffic ordinance. But when we are all lawbreakers the law is discredited and, what is worse, the government can selectively and arbitrarily enforce whatever law is convenient against any “trouble-maker.”

Furthermore, as another Italian theorist, Giovanni Sartori, has pointed out, when legislation is thought of as the primary source of law, citizens become more accustomed to following orders, and thus become more docile, servile, and less independent. Once people lose their rebellious spirit, it is easier and more likely for the government to become tyrannical.

Because of the danger of legislation, several constitutional safeguards should accompany its exercise. Supermajority and referendum requirements are one way to limit the legislature. Another way would be for all legislation to be constitutionally limited to replacing the opinion of a given court decision with a new decision. Then, if a given case or line of cases were issued that had particularly egregious reasoning or results, the legislature could rewrite the unfortunate opinion in better form, and enact this into law, as if the court had first issued the rewritten decision. The rewritten opinion would then assume the status of a judicial precedent, at least for that court.

This limit on the legislature’s ability would prevent it from enacting huge legislative schemes like the Americans with Disabilities Act out of whole cloth. To the extent the legislated “substitute opinion” strayed from the facts of the particular case, it would be merely dicta, of no binding force.

Sunset provisions that automatically repeal legislation unless re-enacted after a given number of years are also useful. Another prophylactic measure would be an absolute right to jury trials in all cases, civil or criminal, so that government could not escape the jury requirement by calling truly criminal sanctions “civil.” This should be combined with a requirement that the jury be made aware of their right to judge the law’s validity as well as the defendant’s liability or guilt.

The Role of Commentators and Codes

Law codes are essential in the development, systematization, and promulgation of law. Modern civil codes of civil-law systems are one example of very impressive and useful codifications that developed under the largely decentralized Roman law system. However, the dangers of legislation also counsel that legal codifications not be legislated. There is no reason that law codes cannot be privately written. Indeed, Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Law of England was private and very successful in codifying the law, and we today have successful, private treatises such as the Restatements of the law. Law codes would be far more rational and systematic, and shorter, if they did not have to take an unwieldy and interfering body of legislation into account; if they could focus primarily on common-law developments.

Both private and statutory codification of existing case law can make mistakes. But if the code is private, judges can ignore the lapses in the codifier’s reasoning. This has the extra benefit of giving an incentive to private codifiers not to engage in dishonest reasoning or meddlesome social planning. If a codifier wants his work to be used and acknowledged, he will attempt to accurately describe the existing body of law when he organizes and presents it, and will likely be explicit when recommending that judges adopt certain changes in future decisions.

Both the Roman law and common law have been corrupted into today’s inferior legislation-dominated systems. The primacy of legislation should be abandoned, and we should return to a system of judge-found law. Scholars who codify naturally-evolved law have a vital function to serve, but they should not ask for the governmental imprimatur on their scholarly efforts.

Of course, the form of a legal system does not guarantee that just laws will be adopted. We must always be vigilant and urge that individual freedom be respected, whether by legislator or judge.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Bellwether and Others

As promised, here are a few brief and fragmented thoughts on Bellwether by Connie Willis, taken from my reading journal:

Shorter and a bit more simplistic than usual for Connie Willis. Her strength is always in her fabulously-written characters, but they seemed less developed and rather flatter than usual.

Nonetheless, it was fantastically enjoyable, engaging, creative, and laugh-outloud funny. One of my favorite things about Willis is her chapter openers--always unique. Bellwether's openers are exceptionally hilarious.

All in all, loved it. Not Willis at her best, certainly, but hugely entertaining. 5 stars!


I am now reading On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction by William Zinsser. This is indeed a classic, and one that I anticipate coming back to many times! Not only is it packed full of fabulous advice, it's also zany and hilarious. I will likely be reviewing this one as well, once I have the chance to get through it.

---

I am reminded again of what a blessing it is to attend a Christian college. As I was writing an extra-credit assignment for my International Business class tonight, reflecting on the sovereignty of God and evangelism, I thought to myself, "How many students get the chance to write on theology in an International Business class?!?!" I love it. It's evenings like tonight when I remember why I chose to do what I'm doing in pursuing my education from a Christian worldview perspective. It's all worth it!

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Tuesday Ten

Today I am thankful for:

1. God's sovereignty.
2. Sunshine.
3. Chai tea.
4. My piano.
5. New classes (being one step closer to finishing!).
6. Mom's creative concoctions.
7. Music.
8. Hugs.
9. Journals.
10. Laughter.

Thoughts on Bellwether by Connie Willis (which I finished this past weekend) coming soon!

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

The latest monkey business in Washington...

I don't know whether to be hugely inspired to action or just hugely disheartened every time something like this happens. It is my hope that I (and all the rest of us who are concerned by developments like this!) can channel my frustration into action, and do what I can, in whatever small or great ways, to make a difference.

From American Solutions:

This Washington Post headline yesterday is all you need to know about how corrupt the process has become to pass ObamaCare by any means necessary this week: "House may try to pass Senate health-care bill without voting on it."

Huh? You read that correctly. Because Speaker Pelosi cannot find enough votes to pass the deeply unpopular ObamaCare bill in a constitutional way, she is hoping you and other Americans won't notice, or won't care, whether she passes ObamaCare in an unconstitutional and blatantly corrupt way.

Her latest plan is called the "Slaughter Rule", which would allow the House to vote on a different bill and "deem" the Senate's ObamaCare bill as being "passed" at the same time as the other bill is passed, without having an actual up and down vote on the ObamaCare bill.

Said Pelosi in an interview: "It's more insider and process-oriented than most people want to know....but I like it, because people don't have to vote on the Senate bill."

Pelosi may like "deeming" laws passed, but passing laws without voting on them is blatantly unconstitutional. As former federal judge Michael McConnell wrote in the Wall Street Journal:

"It may be clever, but it is not constitutional. To become law...the Senate health-care bill must actually be signed into law. The Constitution speaks directly to how that is done. According to Article I, Section 7, in order for a "Bill" to "become a Law," it "shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate" and be "presented to the President of the United States" for signature or veto. Unless a bill actually has "passed" both Houses, it cannot be presented to the president and cannot become a law."

Speaker Pelosi and President Obama are counting on you, your friends, and your family not to notice or care that they are doing this. That's why together, we must get the truth out and tell everyone that we know about what they are trying to do.

This is just one more example of the bribery and corruption that has been used to try and pass ObamaCare, like the Cornhusker Kickback and the Louisiana Purchase.

If they are willing to corrupt our constitutional system right before our eyes to pass Obamacare, why should we have any confidence that they won't corrupt your healthcare when nobody is paying attention?

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Rediscovering Bond

For some reason, I suddenly remembered today that I had not listened to Bond in a rather long time, and as Meg and I tackled some projects at the office, we cranked the speakers and let these talented girls' highly unorthodox take on classical music fill the room! It was loads of fun. I'm generally a purist when it comes to classical music (in other words, if it ain't broken, don't mess with it!), but I have to admit that Bond is just plain enjoyable. They somehow manage to (generally) keep the original feel of the classical piece, but still add the pop sound that almost turns it into dance music in some cases. It's not something that I would necessarily want to listen to all the time, but on occasion, it sure can be a blast.

Watch out -- you just might start dancing. =]

This piece is one of my favorites:


Tuesday, March 2, 2010

On democracy

An absolutely fantastic Alexis de Tocqueville quote I found today while making my way through a project at work:

"After having thus successively taken each member of the community in its powerful grasp and fashioned him at will, the supreme power [of democracy] then extends its arm over the whole community. It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided… men are seldom forced to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting… Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people… Thus, their spirit is gradually broken… gradually losing the faculties of thinking, feeling, and acting for themselves. [People then console themselves at the loss of their liberties] by the reflection that they have chosen their own guardians."


I wonder what our many democracy-extolling leaders would say to that!

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Today's favorite video find

This video has been "making the rounds" on Facebook, and I finally watched it today. Absolutely adorable! The second video tells the story of the original video, and also includes a statement of their desire to praise the Lord with their talents. What a sweet testimony.


Tuesday, February 23, 2010

Trivial Tuesday =]

Over the weekend and the last several days, I have...

- Rediscovered how much I love letters, both writing them and receiving them.

- Watched 9 episodes of 24. (People who say it's addicting are absolutely not joking!)

- Thoroughly enjoyed watching Evan Lysacek and Tessa Virtue & Scott Moir win Olympic gold. Virtue & Moir, I do believe, are my favorites so far this winter Olympics.

- Basked in the comfort and coziness of a rainy afternoon.


To those who have also been watching the Olympics -- what is/are your favorite moment/moments?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Eighteen years ago...



This picture pretty accurately sums up how excited I was to have a little sister. I distinctly remember this moment: sitting with couch cushions under my arms so I could hold her for the first time. I was thrilled beyond words! As much as I was in love with her that day, though, little did I know that she would become my sunshine and joy and my best friend. Now, eighteen years later, I simply cannot imagine my life without her. God smiled on me when he gave me my little sister!

Happy birthday, darling. I love you so much.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Thoughts on 'Avatar'

I have attempted several times to write a review of Avatar, but between a lack of time and a bit of rustiness as far as my reviewing skills recently, I simply have not had the chance to come up with something adequate. However, a friend of mine had some excellent thoughts that summed up, concisely and coherently, pretty much exactly what I would say about the movie. I'd be interested in the opinions of others who have seen it. It's intriguing to see the vast range of opinions on the subject.

Thanks, Chris, for letting me share your thoughts!

-------

Avatar was a most excellent movie. Entertaining, engrossing, fascinating. After a bit, I forgot most of it was CGI, they did such an AMAZING job. And the 3d....VERY well done. Going into the movie, I knew nothing about it except that it was CGI and 3d. I thought it didn't have much going for it. :)

Coming out of it, I felt that it was genuinely one of the most amazing movies and pieces of storytelling I'd ever witnessed. Now, to the criticisms.

It is full of new-agey stuff a Christian should not enjoy. -- Well, I've heard this leveraged against many things I enjoy. Fantasy literature, Science Fiction, Roleplaying Games, etc. etc. etc. The fact of the matter is, the entire story hinges upon something that does not exist: namely, the whole network of trees Ewah thing. (I think that was the name.) Doesn't exist. Also, it's on a planet that takes 6 years to get to on a space ship. This is sort of another bit of fiction, right? Ultimately, this argument hinges upon the concept that one should not enjoy any fantastic fiction. Same argument used against Harry Potter. Aaaaaaand we've had that discussion. ;)

It portrays the military in an evil light! -- I don't know about this one. The military does not exist to determine right and wrong, and always pursue right. The military exists to get "the job" done. The military does not exist to question the rightness of every order. The military exists to obey orders. What I think this movie portrays is the evil that occurs when those making the decisions are freed from any sort of moral consequences for their actions. When unbridled greed is allowed to make the decisions, and when they're given the power of military might, the military simply follows orders, and evil results. Now, one would hope that in the event that decent men are given the orders to slaughter comparatively innocent civilians, they'd revolt. However, men who thought themselves to be decent have committed unspeakable evil in the name of following orders. (Have a look at the Stanley Milgram obedience experiment sometime, if you've never heard of it.) At any rate, I think that while this point may have SOME merit, it again is rooted in fantasy (or science fiction). In reality, the military (who for all appearances is from the U.S.) is controlled by a government limited (necessarily) by checks and balances. These checks prevent such a misuse of power. The military in the movie is controlled by a corporation beholden to no government or moral authority, but rather only to the bottom line and the shareholders.

This movie portrays capitalism in an evil light! -- I have no doubt that this is one aim of Cameron. You don't need me to tell you that this movie is again not based in reality. There are laws which protect the liberty of others in our world. This is the necessary evil of government. It is based in the evil of mankind; that fact that mankind will exploit and usurp the liberties of others if not prevented.

There are a lot of other criticisms. One is that the movie is derivative. Someone called it "Dances with Avatars". I've never seen Dances with Wolves, so I can't comment. I thought the concept of an Avatar was awesome, and one of the most memorable scenes is when Sully gets to run. You can just imagine how long he's wanted to do that. When he feels the earth with his toes. It was really touching.

Those are some of my thoughts. :)

-------

Then I read an extremely interesting article by Anthony Gregory over at The Beacon today, which makes some similar points about Avatar. While I wouldn't necessarily agree with everything he says, his points are certainly quite thought-provoking.

-------

James Cameron’s blockbuster Avatar is a thrill to see, and various commentators have judged the film for whatever ideological message they have found in it, but what struck me most is that the Na’vi people, in defending their land on Pandora from the imperialist exploitation by the humans, are engaging in one of the few just wars you’ll ever see, in fiction or real life. It reminded me of the clearly just defense of Narnia in the first Chronicles of Narnia film, so stark was the issue of right and wrong.

The movie has been lambasted by some conservatives who want to conceive of the movie into a message about environmentalism. Of course, actual pollution, strip-mining and the destruction of indigenous people’s lands by uninvited foreign corporations empowered through militaristic might should not be defended in any event—and such devastation of habitats is a very real, tangible act of aggression, unlike the far more tenuous environmental concerns like global warming that have distracted the entire conservation movement from genuine environmental degradation.

And the key point here is that the Na’vi are in fact people, sentient beings, much like the seemingly primitive alien races brutalized by the human-dominated empire in the Star Wars saga, or many other such epic stories. The Na’vi also command their own environment, taming and domesticating lower lifeforms, willing to put their own lives above those of the flora and fauna on Pandora, when need be.

It is true that they have a different set of values than modern industrialized man, but this is no reason to dispense with their property and community rights over their own territory. Whether one comes away admiring their cultural values or not—personally, unlike many who saw it, I was glad to be back inside with modern technology when the flick ended—the Na’vi rites and rituals work for their own circumstances. The Na’vi respect nature, but understand this respect as important in the context of utilizing nature for their own health and happiness. Their rituals of nature worship could be twisted into some message about the green movement, but so could the fact that the invaders in Independence Day sought to steal Earth’s natural resources. It is a real theme in history and an established one in myth that criminal gangs, bands of aggressors, states and quasi-governmental corporations will conquer indigenous peoples and rob them of their land and resources. Besides, even considering the peculiar relationship the Na’vi have to their land, one could see it as a form of technological transformation, a command of nature that the Na’vi have learned to wield. They treat nature with respect, but in a human way—taking control of animals and plants—and thus are very unlike the modern anti-human environmentalist ideal that sometimes puts sentient beings below other life forms. If James Cameron indeed intended a typical environmentalist trope, he failed.

The Na’vi have a mystical connection to their land that might bug some people, seeing all lifeforms as interwoven in a somewhat holy relationship, but this should be no more objectionable than the way the Jedi approach the Force. It is also plausible to say that the Na’vi simply have a respect for natural law, objective truth and morality that is completely lost on the materialistic, utilitarian and militarized humans who come in to steal their land. This movie is about one people defending their property rights as well as cultural values against an unambiguously rapacious and aggressive modernist invader. In any event, primitives have a right to defend whatever seemingly bizarre yet peaceful cultural practices are part of their identity.

And the way they defend it is unquestionably just. The war is winnable, unlike most that modern governments find themselves engaged in. It is declared by the proper authority, insofar as all the tribes voluntarily congregate to fight the invader. It is a last resort, since the human aggressors seem intent to exterminate all who try to stay on their land. The violence is proportional and no innocents are attacked. The only people who are harmed are belligerents. What’s more, the Na’vi take prisoners, who seem to be humanely treated, in massive numbers and let them return to where they came from in peace. Although defending their turf and having lost many of their people to the humans’ aggression, the Na’vi are much more humane in their response than the aggressors.

It excites me that people see this movie and cheer for the good guys, because rarely in a movie are the good guys so emphatically in the right and the bad guys so inescapably in the wrong. I love cheering for the white hats in an action or fantasy movie, but few protagonists offer as much with which to sympathize without reservation as do the Na’vi people. Even in Star Wars, there is more moral ambiguity, as the rebels and Jedi commit acts of fraud and violence against non-aggressors. But the real lesson here is that a truly just war is much more difficult to find in the real world, where usually both sides are at least somewhat substantially in the wrong. However, generally one side is more wrong than the other, and when we look at this movie in the context of America’s ongoing foreign policy that has persisted for decades, it could not be clearer than the Na’vi, whatever they symbolize, do not represent the U.S. government.

-------

Thoughts? Comments? Disagreements?

Monday, February 15, 2010

Sunshine and silliness

Maybe it is the absolutely gorgeous sunshine and blue skies and fresh air today...

Maybe it is my silly sister playing the most wacky music and making me laugh...

Maybe it is having a wonderful time with the Lord in Galatians this morning...

Maybe it is discovering that this week is going to be much easier school-wise...

Maybe it is the evidence of God's care and faithfulness...

... whatever it is, it is glorious!

Even though it's Monday, I am smiling. A lot. I like smiling days.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

Lamb of God

Your only Son, no sin to hide
But you have sent him from your side
To walk upon this guilty sod
And to become the Lamb of God

Your gift of love they crucified
They laughed and scorned Him as He died
The humble King, they named a fraud
And sacrificed the Lamb of God

I was so lost I should have died
But you have brought me to your side
To be led by your staff and rod
And to be called a lamb of God

O Lamb of God, sweet Lamb of God
I love the holy Lamb of God
O wash me in His precious blood
My Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Becoming intellectually virtuous

“We are all familiar with the notion of a moral virtue: traits such as generosity, compassion, courage, temperance, and patience. These are well-anchored, abiding personal qualities we acquire that reliably dispose us to think, feel, and behave in certain ways when circumstances demand it. … Intellectual virtues have received less attention: these include character traits such as wisdom, prudence, foresight, understanding, discernment, truthfulness, and studiousness, among others. … An epistemology that takes the virtues seriously claims that our ability to lay hold of the truth about important matters turns on more than our IQ or the caliber of school we attend; it also depends on whether we have fostered within ourselves virtuous habits of mind. Our careers as cognitive agents, as persons concerned to lay hold of the truth and pursue other important intellectual goals, will in large measure succeed or fail as we cultivate our intellectual virtues.

“Thinking about epistemology as encompassing the pursuit of intellectual virtue, while presently unfashionable, was the dominant way of casting epistemological concerns in the writings of Aristotle, Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and other philosophers of the ancient and medieval tradition. Your intellectual life is important, according to these thinkers, for the simple reason that your very character, the kind of person you are and are becoming, is at stake. Careful oversight of our intellectual lives is imperative if we are to think well, and thinking well is an indispensable ingredient in living well. According to this tradition, only by superintending our cognitive life (the way, for example, we form, defend, maintain, revise, abandon, and act on our beliefs about important matters) can we become excellent as thinkers and, ultimately, excellent as person.

“If we fail to oversee our intellectual life and cultivate virtue, the likely consequence will be a maimed and stunted mind that thwarts our prospects for living a flourishing life.”


~ Taken from chapter 1 of my second textbook for my philosophy class, Epistemology: Becoming Intellectually Virtuous by W. Jay Wood.

Need I say that I am fascinated and loving it??? It is classes like this that make me wish I had a traditional semester’s length in which to enjoy it to the fullest, rather than the 8-week setting, which feels so short when I’m really loving a class. I fully intend to read this book again once I have officially finished classes in July. I know there are many other gems hidden in its pages that I simply will not have time to mine in the course of this class.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

New favorite treat



A perfect scoop of good vanilla ice cream, drizzled with fresh Meyer lemon juice. Best if you pop it back into the freezer for a minute so the lemon juice gets slightly icy. It's refreshing and oh-so-delicious! The only bad thing is that it almost makes ice cream seem good for you.

Hmmmmmm... =D

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Stones of remembrance

In Joshua chapter 4, after the children of Israel have witnessed another demonstration of God's power as they crossed the Jordan River, God instructs the Israelites to do something very interesting: "And Joshua said to them, 'Pass on before the ark of the Lord your God into the midst of the Jordan, and take up each of you a stone upon his shoulder, according to the number of the tribes of the people of Israel, that this may be a sign among you. When your children ask in time to come, "What do those stones mean to you?" then you shall tell them that the waters of the Jordan were cut off before the ark of the covenant of the Lord. When it passed over the Jordan, the waters of the Jordan were cut off. So these stones shall be to the people of Israel a memorial forever.'" (Joshua 4:4-7)

I've always found this to be such an intriguing passage, and in pondering it last night, I started thinking about the idea of setting up "stones of remembrance" in our lives. I do not think this concept is something that was intended merely for the people of Israel in the time of Joshua; rather, I believe that this is something we should seriously think about in our everyday lives. How many times do we see the hand of God at work in our lives, in clear and powerful ways, and what do we do to remember and keep that experience as a reminder of God's faithfulness? The Bible does tell us to remember the goodness of the Lord; to be reminded of His love and care for us, perhaps especially as an encouragement during times of difficulty.

What exactly should these stones of remembrance look like in our lives? Of that I am not sure. But I do think it is an important, biblical idea to commit to remembering the work of God in our lives. We forget so easily--we doubt so easily--and I think it is for this reason that God instructed His people to set up clear, visible reminders of His care for them. Sometimes we need something that is a tangible reminder of God's past faithfulness, so that we remember that we have no reason to doubt the fact that He will keep us in His care in the future.

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

A lovely winter day

What a grand thing it was to open the door at the office today and let in some glorious fresh air! The (slightly) warmer air and sunshine made an afternoon walk a necessity today. It was invigorating and gave me a bit more energy for accounting homework, which is still maddeningly just hovering above my comprehension. I think the first three chapters are going to merit yet another re-reading.

Nevertheless!

Praising God for...

... smiles.
... His Word.
... friends who inspire me.
... changing seasons.
... afternoon naps.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Monday randoms

It's Monday. Sometimes I love Monday, and sometimes I detest it. Today I am glowingly happy and love Monday. I'm not sure where the difference comes in. Some days God just smiles on you...

---

"... It should be emphasized that philosophy is an intellectual passion, not merely the abstract application of technique. To assume that logic will (or can) settle everything is to fall prey to what some philosophers have called the 'illusion of technique.' Philosophy is not about winning points or arguments or being clever, although you will inevitably encounter some of this. It is caring about truth and, as the word philosophy itself originally meant, 'loving wisdom.'"

(From my philosophy textbook--perhaps an extension of my last post on philosophy!)

---

I finished Passage (by Connie Willis) last night. It was quite terrific. I must say that I was rather stunned by how it concluded; a gigantic plot twist in the last 150 pages made for an ending that was nothing like what I anticipated! It was, as Connie Willis always is, an emotional journey, with much laughter and this time many tears as well as I finished it. I still am uncertain as to whether or not she was trying to make any spiritual statement, as much of the central plot centers around the idea of the supernatural and particularly the "NDE" or "near-death experience." It got almost morbid at times (again, somewhat to be expected from the author of something like Doomsday Book [which, incidentally, as I have noted elsewhere, was also fantastic, even if it was horribly depressing]), but somehow there was enough light to keep it from being depressing in the end. I say bravo again, Ms. Willis!

---

How have I only heard one song by Yiruma until just a few days ago? How did I not even know about this brilliant pianist? My Yiruma playlist has been on repeat at the office for the last four days. Love it!!!

---

After a dear friend gave me the heads-up on some new Masterpiece Theatre releases, I have been watching the new adaptation of Emma. It's been quite delightful so far, though I haven't even finished the first episode yet. The only other version I've seen is the Gwyneth Paltrow/Jeremy Northam version, and so far this one is very different, but I am certainly enjoying it. I imagine I will be posting further thoughts after I finish it!

Saturday, January 23, 2010

Philosophizing...

In case I haven’t made it clear yet, I am loving my philosophy class this quarter. I was reasonably excited when my books arrived (a basic introductory text and then separate books on epistemology, metaphysics, ethics, and philosophy of religion), but now that I have begun to really dive into the class, I am discovering that I simply can’t get enough. Why? Because this is the type of learning that I have always loved and will always love. Studying philosophy encourages the style of learning that I think should apply to any subject—inquiring, probing, and questioning deeply.

Philosophy encourages me as a student to abandon all my presuppositions and preconceived ideas. It is all about asking ultimate questions and not being willing to rest until I understand exactly what I believe and why. There is a danger to such reckless questioning, of course; if followed to an extreme, a philosophy student could potentially reach the point where he or she no longer thinks that there are any objective answers to life’s ultimate questions. But with the proper—and, as a Christian, I would add, biblical—framework in which to pursue the study, I am discovering that it is both an exhilarating and enlightening experience.

This is the kind of learning that I love. Rather than rote memorization and meaningless repetition of facts, this is all about asking questions and getting to the heart of an issue. It’s all about understanding how and why things work the way they do. It’s all about not just understanding a concept, but understanding why that concept is important, and how it relates to our lives in God’s world.

So much learning, especially in the modern education system, is superficial, trite, and seems unimportant to the student. We barely scratch the surface; we don’t understand why certain things are important or even relevant to everyday life. Developing a philosophical mindset (learning to ask the ultimate questions and pursue more than just surface knowledge) restores to the process of learning the joy, wonder, and excitement of discovery that should have been there in the first place. It is a wonderful thing to find oneself standing on the threshold of knowledge—to get that first taste of new facts and ideas that draw back the curtain on something that you’ve never thought about before. There is a sense of eagerness and excitement. There is a true joy in learning. And that is not something that is found through education that barely skims the surface, drilling the facts so the student can spit out the right answers for the test but leaving so much richness just out of reach. Those treasure troves of knowledge are what we should be reaching for every day; what we should be seeking our whole lives, not just when we’re students.

This is the kind of learning that gets me excited. This is the picture of eagerly seeking knowledge that I want to share with my own children someday, God willing. This is the kind of discovery that makes me recognize all over again just how magnificent is the God who gave us the gift of learning—and how small I am—and how much He still has to teach me.

Friday, January 22, 2010

On the anniversary of Roe v. Wade...

Andrea posted this on her blog today. It illustrates the beautiful, precious gift of life... and brought tears to my eyes. May it bless you, too.

99 Balloons from Igniter Media on Vimeo.


5 Things I Love

#1 - A huge mug of hot chocolate, one that's large enough to wrap both hands around it.

#2 - The world in vibrant, glorious color after a solid week of rain.

#3 - Clair de Lune.

#4 - Reading by lamplight with a soft blanket and fluffy pillows.

and

#5 - The way my boyfriend makes me laugh.


Happy Friday everyone. =)


Wednesday, January 20, 2010

"Your worst days are never so bad that you're beyond the reach of God's grace. And your best days are never so good that you're beyond the need of God's grace."

- from Jerry Bridges, "Holiness Day by Day"

Recent acquisitions...


The Three Musketeers -- highly recommended to me by a good friend whose literary judgment I trust implicitly.

Passage -- it's Connie Willis. Enough said.

Bleak House -- saw the Masterpiece Theatre adaptation over the summer and absolutely LOVED it. I can't wait to read the book.

The Count of Monte Cristo -- I have been looking for a paperback, unabridged edition for about two years now, and was so thrilled to finally find one. I think this will be a good book to take to Lake Tahoe this summer. =)


So far, Passage is the only one I've actually started reading, and I don't anticipate that I will get to the others any time soon, alas. But Passage has been quite brilliant so far! I'll post more detailed thoughts once I finish it...

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Till We Have Faces, Part 2

So, after discussing the book with my mom (who was the one who sent me Edie's review), we dug out my copy yesterday so that Mom could read it, since she was quite intrigued by the review. I knew my copy would be in a somewhat unreadable condition, due to the fact that it would still have all my notes from my class in it. This was indeed the case, but as I sat in front of the fire with it last night, I came to the reluctant conclusion that none of my notes were incredibly critical, so I pulled them all out so that Mom can wade through the book accompanied only by underlining, highlighting, and other notating, rather than by underlining, highlighting, notating, AND a post-it note every other page!

The process simply demanded pictures, and of course, then a blog post.




^^ The "unedited" book, exactly in the condition I left it after my class.




^^ Even after removing some of the post-its, many of the pages still look like this. ::grin::




^^ The aftermath. Which then went in the fire!

Happy reading, Mum! =]

Monday, January 18, 2010

Till We Have Faces

Reading this review over at Life In Grace has made me want to pull out my copy of C.S. Lewis's masterpiece, Till We Have Faces, again. TWHF was the first and, as far as I can remember, the only book that I read straight through within 24 hours, got to the last page, and immediately turned back to page one and started again. I was lucky enough to be reading it as homework for a C.S. Lewis class, and was blessed with the insight of a brilliant professor, so I was able to get even more out of it than I might have otherwise. Reading Edie's review reminded me of how much the book absolutely blew me away, and I think it is definitely about time I read it again, since it's been several years now.

What a pity that I just started back to school today and probably won't be doing a whole lot of extra reading for the next several months. . . ::sigh:: Oh well. Thoughts or comments from anyone else how has read it???

Enjoying this gloriously rainy storm, and glad to have a fire to sit in front of while I brave the first week of homework. Most of all, thankful that His mercies are new every morning!

Friday, January 15, 2010

Things I have learned/been reminded of lately...

In no particular order...

... God's ways are not my ways. His ways are infinitely beyond anything I could ask or hope or imagine!

... I love Christmas, and I hate taking down Christmas decorations.

... I love San Francisco.

... Put four young people who are all former debaters in the same vehicle, and hilarious stories will ensue.

... Christmas break is wonderful.

... There's nothing quite like curling up in front of a crackling fire with a good book on a cold, wintry day.

... I like singing at the office when I'm there by myself and no one is around to have to listen to me. =D

... I love new books. Words almost fail to describe how excited I get at having new books.

... I love how Owl City lyrics can make absolutely no sense and yet still be fantastic. =]

... Connie Willis is officially one of my favorite authors, and I would be thrilled to read every book she's ever written.

Sunday, January 3, 2010

A New Year's prayer

Fill thou my life, O Lord my God,
In ev'ry part with praise,
That my whole being may proclaim
Thy being and thy ways.

Not for the lip of praise alone,
Nor e'en the praising heart,
I ask, but for a life made up
Of praise in ev'ry part;

Praise in the common things of life,
Its goings out and in,
Praise in each duty and each deed,
However small and mean.

Fill ev'ry part of me with praise;
Let all my being speak
Of thee and of they love, O Lord,
Poor though I be, and weak.

So shalt thou, Lord, from me, e'en me,
Receive the glory due,
And so shall I begin on earth
The song for ever new.

So shall no part of day or night
From sacredness be free:
But all my life, in ev'ry step,
Be fellowship with thee.